Home Civil Law Page 2

Civil Law

Easy Definition of Minor in Possession

Easy Definition of Minor in Possession

Minor in possession (MIP) is considered a serious offense that denotes an individual under the age of 21 years old in possession of alcoholic substances. The charges or penalties associated with MIP will vary based on the jurisdiction and the presence of prior convictions. 
Since minors, or those under the age of 21 years old, are the only individuals that can be found guilty, the first wrongdoing or charge is primarily focused on educating the individual to the dangers associated with underage drinking.
Subsequent charges for a minor in possession will be more severe and generally include the following penalties: Fines up to $500 which are paid to the underlying courthouse, a suspension of an individual’s driver’s license, a mandatory alcohol or drug awareness class, probation, and mandatory community service. 

Discover Areas Of Civil Law You Didn’t Know

Discover Areas Of Civil Law You Didn't Know

Civil law includes cases that involve an individual bringing a lawsuit against another individual or entity. In criminal cases the state or Federal Government prosecutes an individual for a crime and seeks criminal penalties. In a civil case, however, the individual or entity sues an individual or entity in the hopes of receiving some compensatory award.
Civil cases may include personal injury claims. For example, an individual that falls on a property due to some action or inaction by the owner may attempt to take the case to civil court. Civil court may include small claims of less than five hundred dollars, or large claims in which an individual is seeking several types of compensatory damage awards.
In civil cases, compensatory damages may include damages for injury, including medical bills and lost wages which resulted from that injury.

Fast Outline on Privacy Laws

Fast Outline on Privacy Laws

Privacy law
is the area of the legal code that is concerned with the protection and
preservation of an individual’s privacy rights. Privacy and the laws that
protect it is quickly becoming a hot topic because of advancements in computer
technology and the subsequent increase of a corporation or government’s ability
to obtain private information on an individual. As a result of these advancements,
privacy law has been more stringently delivered through both Federal and state
forms of government.

The law of privacy, on both the Federal and state
level, regulates the type of information which may be collected and how the
information is stored and used. In general, the Federal Government is
responsible for establishing privacy laws and regulating them based on basic
restrictions. The state governments then are awarded the ability to interpret these
laws and making any alterations to better protect their particular community or
employment market.

Learn the Age For A Driver’s License

Learn the Age For A Driver's License

There is no general age at which teenagers in the U.S. can get their driver’s license, due to this determination being left up to the discretion of individual state legislatures. As such, the age in which a driver’s license can first be obtained ranges between 14 years and 3 months and 17 years.
Moreover, the age at which a driver’s license can be obtained may be subject to the additional imposition of graduated licensing, according to which more restrictive licenses will first be granted to drivers prior to obtaining a full driver’s license. 
The age at which a driver’s license is granted to teenagers may depend on the degree to which the individual state is urbanized and populated. In this regard, New Jersey might be noted as having the highest age requirement for a driver’s license to be granted at 17 years old, while the less densely populated South Dakota has the lowest age level.

Read This Before Filing A Wrongful Death Lawsuit

Read This Before Filing A Wrongful Death Lawsuit

Wrongful death lawsuits typically revolve around the death of an individual through a negligent or reckless action of another individual or entity. Wrongful death suits are typically filed by the family members of the wrongful death victims.
The victim’s family can file the suit to seek compensation against the person whose reckless or negligent action resulted in the victim’s death. The families can claim compensation for the loss of inheritance, support, funeral expenses, or medical expenses. 
If you wish to file a wrongful death lawsuit, you must ensure that your case is filed within the period prescribed the applicable statute of limitations in your particular state. The statute of limitations will prescribe the time period within which your claim must be filed. If you do not file during this timeframe, you will lose your right to file a claim.
Although each state possesses their own wrongful death laws, they generally uphold the same principles. You must prove that the death of the victim was caused by a wrongful act or negligent conduct. You must prove, beyond a reasonable doubt, that the defendant is liable for your family member’s death. In addition, you must prove that you have suffered the loss of real wages or finances to win a wrongful death suit.

Read About Fines For A Burned CD Before It Happens to You

Read About Fines For A Burned CD Before It Happens to You

A burned CD is a replicated compact disk that stores music through the use of copying a previously recorded CD or utilizing illegal downloading to make a mix of music on a CD. Regardless of what is on the burned CD or how it is replicated, the act of copying or downloading music is a violation of copyright law. As a result of these replicated actions, it is a misdemeanor to sell burned CDs.
That being said, a private market, meaning a transaction between two private buyers, is nearly impossible to regulate, especially considering the fact that gifts or transactions involving blank CDs is viewed as a petty act. 
In theory, giving someone a burned CD is considered illegal and a fineable offense, but the ability to enforce such transactions is nearly impossible. Couple this struggle with the fact that the transactions do no precipitate harm and the result is a lack of enforcement of selling or buying burned CDs.
If caught, however, the fines for selling a burned CD will greatly fluctuate and vary based on the amount of CDs transacted and the location of the transaction.

Common Law Overview

Common Law Overview

What is Common Law?
Common Law is defined as type of legal methodology undertaken by a specific jurisdiction; the adoption of statutory legal structure mandated by the precepts expressed within Common Law are considered to differ from those jurisdictions undertaking a legal methodology rooted in Civil Law. Common Law is considered to stem from Roman Law, which a multitude of historians credit as providing the earliest incarnations of legal statues and stipulations; not only were a variety of Roman Laws absorbed by the tenets of Common Law, but many facets of Roman Law are considered to be both legally – and structurally – sound despite its development dating back to 439 BCE.

Common Law Judicial Review
Judicial review undertaken by Common Law justices, as well as Common Law Court systems are considered to be heavily reliant on past judicial decision and sentencing in lieu of stipulations and legal tenets expressed in the textual incarnation of the law; this protocol of judicial review that is undertaken by Common Law legal system is a primary differentiation between jurisdictions employing Common Law and those employing Civil Law:
Civil Law enacts its judicial review in accordance to statutory precepts and tenets expressed within written and textual legislature; although justices within a Civil Law system may be entitled to expand or interpret the law with regard to their sentencing, the formulation of judicial review resides primarily on a textual, referential basis
Common Law is considered to rely more heavily – if not completely – on the legal statutes and stipulations inherent to Case Law, which is a legal field within which past sentencing and review are employed as legal guidelines for sentencing; in contrast to Civil Law, many consider Common Law to allow for a more constant restructuring of the justice system undertaken within that jurisdiction

Common Law Legal Practices
Although the United States is not considered to maintain a Common Law judicial system, there do exist elements of Common Law within the American Legal system. One such instance in which Common Law is maintained exists within the circumstance of Common Law Marriage:


Common Law Marriage

A Commonlaw marriageisclassified as a legal matrimony processes that allows for a couple who maintains romantic involvement to be considered legally wed; as in the case of a commonlaw marriage, couples eligible to wed under the precepts of Common Law are not required to participate in a wedding ceremonies; furthermore, these couples are not required to obtain marriage certificates. Although not recognized within each of the 50 United States, Common Law is currently practiced within select states – Couples recognized as legally wed under the precepts of Common Law Marriage are required to:
Present themselves as a married couple both in conduct, as well as lifestyle; this includes behaving in a manner that is indicative of marriage permanent and longstanding in nature
Share a residence for a substantial period of time while undergoing a lifestyle illustrative of cohabitation; this will include a requirement to claim one another as a spouse on all applicable documents, applications, and forms

Easy Definition of Civil Defense

Easy Definition of Civil Defense

What is Definition of a Civil Defense?
Within the realm of a civil lawsuit, applicable protocol with regard to judicial process is classified as the provision of evidence with regard to a matter, event, or circumstance for the review – and subsequent verdict – undertaken by the presiding justice.Civil Defense is defined as a nature of the overarching legal classification innate in the term ‘civil litigation’; however, civil litigation is not limited to the majority of judicial review and legal process undertaken within a civil court proceeding.
With regard to the institution of civil litigation, two parties undergo dispute resolution; these parties are classified as the plaintiff or accusing party, and the defendant, who is responsible for the provision of substantial civil defense. Both the civil complaint, as well as the civil defense is heard before the presiding justice; within civil law legal setting, the hearing is mediated – and subsequently decided – by the presiding judge.

Quick Guide to Small Claims Court

Quick Guide to Small Claims Court

What is Small Claims Court?
Small Claims Court is a legal institution before which cases classified under the jurisdiction of civil law are brought with the intention of undergoing judicial review and the subsequent provision of a verdict. A jurisdictional Small Claims Court will share in the assumed and undertaken legal statutes and statutory regulations applicable to a particular locale; however, in contrast to other types of court or judicial settings, the following procedural differences exist:

Plaintiff
The plaintiff is named as the accusing party responsible for the filing of a lawsuit against another party:
Within the realm of Small Claims Court, litigation does not exist – as a result, the plaintiff is responsible to represent themselves
The plaintiff may not appeal the final verdict in the event that the presiding judge has ruled in favor of the defendant; the plaintiff may only propose a ‘motion to reconsider’ with regard to the verdict imposed within Small Claims Court 


Defendant
The is named as the party accused against whom legal action is filedwithin a judicial hearing taking place in Small Claims Court:
The absence of litigation within Small Claims Court mandates that defendants represent themselves within the process of judicial review
In the event that the presiding judge rules in favor of the defendant, only the defendant will be able to appeal the ruling

Small Claims Court Justice
A justice – or judge – is the judicial officer presiding over judicial activitywith regard to court hearings taking place within the realm of Small Claims Court:
A Small claims Court Judge is responsible to ensure that the protocol of innate procedural legality is maintained and authorized
The presiding judge of Small Claims Court will be the recipient of all accounts and come to a decision solely based on their respective discretion

Which Cases Can Be Heard in Small Claims Court?

Within the setting of Small claims Court, charges must be accompanied with overwhelming evidence concerning the illustration and recounting of the pertinent details of the event in question. In many cases, the burden of proof implicit within lawsuits brought before a Small Claims Courtwill be required to surpass the standard protocol – ‘beyond a reasonable doubt’, which is a legal parameter inherent in traditional lawsuits. Typical cases typically brought before aSmall Claims Courtmay include the following:
Cases in which expectation of financial restitution, which includes settlements and damage, does not exceed $5,000
Cases that are considered to include nonviolent events, accidents, damage, undue harm in the form of torts – within a Small Claims Court, torts are defined as wrongs suffered by one or more individual at the hands of another individual or group of people
Negligence resulting in the suffering one individual at the hands of another individual, typically arising from negligence in lieu of malicious intent
Malicious Intent resulting in the suffering of one individual at the hands of another individual, typically arising from purposeful acting
Liability and the assessment of responsibility with regard to not only the damage sustain, but the nature of the damage, as well as the naming of a responsible party
12Page 2 of 2

EVEN MORE NEWS

POPULAR CATEGORY

©