Laws Lawyers Find Laws Legal Forms State Laws
Home » Legal News » Sexual Harassment Settlement Reached by IHOP Franchise

Sexual Harassment Settlement Reached by IHOP Franchise

December 04, 2012 08:05pm  
The franchise owner of several IHOP restaurants located throughout New Mexico has agreed to settle a sexual discrimination lawsuit for the sum of $1 million.The lawsuit alleged that a class of 22 women had been sexually harassed by a manager at one of the IHOP restaurants owned by the franchisee. The group of women harassed by the manager, Lee Broadnax, ranged in age from women in their teens to those in their twenties.The youngest harassment victim was just sixteen years old at the time the conduct took place. Broadnax engaged in several different types of harassment with multiple employees.In addition to making frequent attempts to kiss female employees, he also touched women who worked for him on their hips and buttocks.He also exhibited behavior that the women being harassed found disturbing, like staring at women employees and licking his lips. Sexual harassment was pervasive in the IHOP restaurant where the lawsuit stemmed from, according to the EEOC.Broadnax was also accused of making comments about women's body parts and stated explicitly that he wanted to take clothes off of one of his employees. The settlement represents a victory for the 22 women who had been victimized by the manager in the case.Strangely, this is not the first time that IHOP franchise owners have faced similar sexual harassment allegations this year.Earlier in the year, IHOP appealed a lower court ruling that held the company liable for harassment by a manager at another restaurant. In that case, young girls had also been harassed by a manager, and the women involved had made complaints against their harasser.The attorneys for IHOP in that case maintained that because all employees, including managers, had attended sexual harassment seminars put on by the company, they were not liable for harassment coming from just one employee. While that argument may have sounded convincing to IHOP, it didn't convince the judge, who found the restaurant liable for the harassment the employees had experienced.The court held that it was not enough to simply have an employee harassment and discrimination policy, or to train people regarding the policy—in order for a company to escape liability,it must be able to demonstrate that it has actually enforced the policy when a complaint is made. The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission has been pursuing discrimination and harassment cases more aggressively in the last several years, following a slowdown during the Bush administration.In addition to pursuing sexual harassment allegations, gender discrimination and cases involving pregnancy discrimination are also ramping up as the EEOC continues to promote its mission of ending workplace discrimination for Americans. IHOP has also agreed to include additional training regarding discrimination and harassment as part of its future employment training, and will provide employees with notice of the settlement. Sources: uscourts.gov, eeoc.gov
Loading...
  • Play
  • Pause
  • Volume:
  • Mute
  • Half
  • Max
  • Sexual Harassment Settlement Reached by IHOP Franchise

     

    The franchise owner of several IHOP restaurants located throughout New Mexico has agreed to settle a sexual discrimination lawsuit for the sum of $1 million.  The lawsuit alleged that a class of 22 women had been sexually harassed by a manager at one of the IHOP restaurants owned by the franchisee.

    The group of women harassed by the manager, Lee Broadnax, ranged in age from women in their teens to those in their twenties.  The youngest harassment victim was just sixteen years old at the time the conduct took place.

    Broadnax engaged in several different types of harassment with multiple employees.  In addition to making frequent attempts to kiss female employees, he also touched women who worked for him on their hips and buttocks.  He also exhibited behavior that the women being harassed found disturbing, like staring at women employees and licking his lips.

    Sexual harassment was pervasive in the IHOP restaurant where the lawsuit stemmed from, according to the EEOC.  Broadnax was also accused of making comments about women's body parts and stated explicitly that he wanted to take clothes off of one of his employees.

    The settlement represents a victory for the 22 women who had been victimized by the manager in the case.  Strangely, this is not the first time that IHOP franchise owners have faced similar sexual harassment allegations this year.  Earlier in the year, IHOP appealed a lower court ruling that held the company liable for harassment by a manager at another restaurant.

    In that case, young girls had also been harassed by a manager, and the women involved had made complaints against their harasser.  The attorneys for IHOP in that case maintained that because all employees, including managers, had attended sexual harassment seminars put on by the company, they were not liable for harassment coming from just one employee.

    While that argument may have sounded convincing to IHOP, it didn't convince the judge, who found the restaurant liable for the harassment the employees had experienced.  The court held that it was not enough to simply have an employee harassment and discrimination policy, or to train people regarding the policy—in order for a company to escape liability,  it must be able to demonstrate that it has actually enforced the policy when a complaint is made.

    The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission has been pursuing discrimination and harassment cases more aggressively in the last several years, following a slowdown during the Bush administration.  In addition to pursuing sexual harassment allegations, gender discrimination and cases involving pregnancy discrimination are also ramping up as the EEOC continues to promote its mission of ending workplace discrimination for Americans.

    IHOP has also agreed to include additional training regarding discrimination and harassment as part of its future employment training, and will provide employees with notice of the settlement.

    Sources: uscourts.gov, eeoc.gov

    Comments

    Must Read

    Affirmative Action Explained Affirmative Action Explained
    People who are interested in the question of “What is affirmative action?” should refer specifically to the legislative history of the United States, in which affirmative action was first conceived and implemented as a means of reversing the effects of systemic discrimination in the educational and employment arenas with respect to members of groups deemed to be underprivileged.
    Civil Law Civil Law
    Civil law refers to the general category for legal systems derived or descended from the framework of laws through which the Roman Empire was administered.
    Direct Discrimination vs. Indirect Discrimination Direct Discrimination vs. Indirect Discrimination
    The concept of discrimination as an offense and a meaningful ground for legal action and remedy is understood in the legal system of the United Kingdom as being split into two specific subjects: direct discrimination and indirect discrimination.
    What are Civil Rights? What are Civil Rights?
    Civil rights are a basic category of human rights afforded to and held by all people according to the modern legal and political theory of the last few hundred years.
    Operation Confirm
    Are you sure you want to delete it?
      
    Tips